Campaigners denounce 'abject failure'
Environmental campaigners yesterday branded the Copenhagen climate summit an abject failure, saying it made progress on financing the battle against climate change but little else.
US President Barack Obama announced the deal at the end of the 12-day, UN-led meeting in the Danish capital, calling an agreement among key leaders "unprecedented" but conceding that it was not enough.
Nnimmo Bassey, chair of Friends of the Earth International, called Copenhagen "an abject failure."
"By delaying action, rich countries have condemned millions of the world's poorest people to hunger, suffering and loss of life as climate change accelerates," he said.
"The blame for this disastrous outcome is squarely on the developed nations."
Kumi Naidoo, head of Greenpeace International, said the agreement contained so many loopholes "you could fly an airplane through it -- Airforce One, for example".
"The only thing we can agree on is the science. Everything else is a fudge, everything else is a fraud, and it must be called as such," he said.
Naidoo added that the outcome of what was intended as a planet-saving deal should be a "wake-up call" for civil society.
"We have to put our leaders under much more pressure than they have been," he said.
The Sierra Club, a leading US environmental group, said that the blame lay largely with the US Senate, which has yet to approve legislation backed by Obama to curb carbon emissions in the world's largest economy.
"President Obama and the rest of the world paid a steep price here in Copenhagen because of obstructionism in the United States Senate," said Carl Pope, the Sierra Club's executive director.
"That a deal was reached at all is testament to President Obama's leadership -- all the more remarkable because of the very weak hand he was dealt."
Pierre Radanne, an advisor to African countries on climate change who is a veteran observer of the negotiation process, told AFP: "It is a breakdown of the United Nations."
Antonio Hill of Oxfam was also scornful. "It can't even be called a deal. It can be called a 'copout' -- It has no deadline for an agreement in 2010, no certainty that it will be legally binding," he told journalists.
"We know that this is going to deliver much anger, much disappointment, much outrage that all these leaders of the world have gathered to deliver just this."
But Hill still looked for a silver lining. "It may deliver a glimmer of hope that countries can still come together, that the door is still open to deliver a truly fair, ambitious and binding agreement," he said.
The WWF environmental group voiced concern that the Copenhagen accord does not bind nations to action.
"A gap between the rhetoric and reality could cost millions of lives, hundreds of billions of dollars and a wealth of lost opportunities," said Kim Carstensen, the leader of the WWF's Global Climate Initiative.
But he said the pledges by individual countries could lead to more action in the future.
"We are disappointed but remain hopeful," he said.
When pushed to explain why NGOs were reluctant to call on delegates from poor countries to reject the deal, Naidoo said it was a no-win situation.
"A bad deal, and no deal are both disastrous and catastrophic choices," he said. "We are caught in the middle."
Comments