Judgment on Jamaat today

All eyes are now on the High Court, as it is set to deliver today the verdict on a writ petition that challenged the legality of Jamaat-e-Islami's registration as a political party.
Bangladesh Tariqat Federation's Secretary General Rezaul Haque Chandpuri and 24 others filed the writ petition on January 25, 2009.
In the petition, they said Jamaat-e-Islami was a religion-based political party and it did not believe in independence and sovereignty of Bangladesh.
Belayet Hossain, a counsel for Jamaat, told The Daily Star that the HC bench of Justice M Moazzam Husain, Justice M Enayetur Rahim and Justice Quazi Reza-Ul Hoque will deliver the verdict at 2:00pm today.
The bench yesterday recorded the case in its cause list for the verdict, he said.
On June 12, the bench concluded hearing on the petition, saying it would deliver its verdict any day.
On November 14, 2008, the Election Commission (EC) listed Jamaat as a registered political party in violation of the Constitution and the spirit of the Representation of People Order (RPO) Ordinance, 2008, petitioners said.
On January 27, 2009, the HC had issued the rule asking Jamaat's chief and its secretary general, and the EC to explain why the party's registration should not be declared illegal.
In reply to the rule, the EC told the HC that some provisions of Jamaat's charter were against the country's constitution and RPO, while Jamaat said the EC had not done any illegality by registering the party.
During the hearing on the petition, petitioners' lawyer Tania Amir told the court that some provisions of Jamaat-e-Islami's charter are contrary to Bangladesh's constitution, the RPO, and the Charter of Medina.
The Charter of Medina, signed and executed by the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and representatives of other religions around 1,400 years ago, was inherently secular and essentially democratic, she added.
Tania also said the EC's decision to register Jamaat-e-Islami as a political party was illegal and unconstitutional, as Jamaat is a communal political party and does not believe in Bangladesh's independence and sovereignty.
As per the constitution, Bangladesh's political parties cannot have an office abroad, but Jamaat was floated in India and has offices abroad, she said.
Meanwhile, Jamaat's chief counsel Abdur Razzaq argued that the writ petition was not acceptable, since Bangladesh Tariqat Federation, which the petitioners belong to, is a religion-based party and not a secular political party.
They cannot challenge the legality of any other political party's registration, he said, adding that Jamaat-e-Islami is a democratic political party.
The EC has not committed any illegality while registering Jamaat-e-Islami as a political party, since the commission has done it to uphold its democratic norms, Razzaq added.

Comments

Judgment on Jamaat today

All eyes are now on the High Court, as it is set to deliver today the verdict on a writ petition that challenged the legality of Jamaat-e-Islami's registration as a political party.
Bangladesh Tariqat Federation's Secretary General Rezaul Haque Chandpuri and 24 others filed the writ petition on January 25, 2009.
In the petition, they said Jamaat-e-Islami was a religion-based political party and it did not believe in independence and sovereignty of Bangladesh.
Belayet Hossain, a counsel for Jamaat, told The Daily Star that the HC bench of Justice M Moazzam Husain, Justice M Enayetur Rahim and Justice Quazi Reza-Ul Hoque will deliver the verdict at 2:00pm today.
The bench yesterday recorded the case in its cause list for the verdict, he said.
On June 12, the bench concluded hearing on the petition, saying it would deliver its verdict any day.
On November 14, 2008, the Election Commission (EC) listed Jamaat as a registered political party in violation of the Constitution and the spirit of the Representation of People Order (RPO) Ordinance, 2008, petitioners said.
On January 27, 2009, the HC had issued the rule asking Jamaat's chief and its secretary general, and the EC to explain why the party's registration should not be declared illegal.
In reply to the rule, the EC told the HC that some provisions of Jamaat's charter were against the country's constitution and RPO, while Jamaat said the EC had not done any illegality by registering the party.
During the hearing on the petition, petitioners' lawyer Tania Amir told the court that some provisions of Jamaat-e-Islami's charter are contrary to Bangladesh's constitution, the RPO, and the Charter of Medina.
The Charter of Medina, signed and executed by the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and representatives of other religions around 1,400 years ago, was inherently secular and essentially democratic, she added.
Tania also said the EC's decision to register Jamaat-e-Islami as a political party was illegal and unconstitutional, as Jamaat is a communal political party and does not believe in Bangladesh's independence and sovereignty.
As per the constitution, Bangladesh's political parties cannot have an office abroad, but Jamaat was floated in India and has offices abroad, she said.
Meanwhile, Jamaat's chief counsel Abdur Razzaq argued that the writ petition was not acceptable, since Bangladesh Tariqat Federation, which the petitioners belong to, is a religion-based party and not a secular political party.
They cannot challenge the legality of any other political party's registration, he said, adding that Jamaat-e-Islami is a democratic political party.
The EC has not committed any illegality while registering Jamaat-e-Islami as a political party, since the commission has done it to uphold its democratic norms, Razzaq added.

Comments

এয়ারফোর্স ওয়ান থেকে নেমে আসছেন প্রেসিডেন্ট ট্রাম্প। ছবি: এএফপি

সংবিধান মেনে চলতে হবে কি না ‘জানেন না’ ট্রাম্প

সাক্ষাৎকারে ট্রাম্পকে সরাসরি প্রশ্ন করা হয়, প্রেসিডেন্ট হিসেবে সংবিধান রক্ষা করা তার দায়িত্ব কিনা। জবাবে ট্রাম্প বলেন, 'আমি জানি না।'

১ ঘণ্টা আগে