01:17 PM, December 20, 2018 / LAST MODIFIED: 02:48 PM, December 20, 2018

HC refuses to hear writ challenging legality of polls schedule

A High Court bench today refused to hear a writ petition challenging the legality of the schedule for the 11th parliamentary election slated for December 30.

The bench of Justice FRM Nazmul Ahasan and Justice Razik-Al Jalil also dropped the petition from the hearing list saying that the bench has no jurisdiction to hear such petition.

Supreme Court lawyer Eunus Ali Akond submitted the petition on November 25 challenging the legality of the polls schedule declared without dissolving the parliament.

After the HC rejected to hear his petition today, Eunus Ali told The Daily Star that he would move it before another HC bench.

WHAT DID EUNUS ALI SAY IN THE PETITION?

In the petition, Eunus Ali prayed to the HC to stay the schedule issued in November by the Election Commission (EC)for holding the election on December 30.

As per article 123 (3) of the constitution, the general election has to be held within 90 days after the parliament is dissolved. However, the EC has announced the schedule while the current parliament is still undissolved, Eunus Ali said citing the petition.

The petition also stated that as per article 12 of the Representation of the People Order (RPO) and article 66 (2)(f), a person holding the post of profit in government service cannot be qualified for contesting the parliamentary election.

Many members of the current parliament, who are receiving remuneration from the state, are reportedly contesting the upcoming parliamentary election. Hence, the upcoming polls cannot be held keeping the current parliament intact, the petition said.


Leave your comments