With Trump's withdrawal from Iran deal, what's at stake? | The Daily Star
12:00 AM, May 17, 2018 / LAST MODIFIED: 01:19 PM, May 17, 2018

With Trump's withdrawal from Iran deal, what's at stake?

President Donald Trump's abrogation of the 2015 international nuclear agreement with Iran is likely to put his America First policy to the test.

Trump's decision to walk away from the agreement that curbed Iran's nuclear programme risks fuelling a nuclear race in the Middle East, particularly if Iran decides that the US withdrawal has rendered the deal unbeneficial.

Competition for a slice of the Middle East's nuclear pie is already in full swing with Saudi Arabia emerging as one of the world's largest and most immediate export markets.

To ensure that the United States remains competitive, Trump is likely to have to compromise on strict US conditions that have governed US nuclear exports until now. Failure to do so could deprive America's nuclear industry of its best option for recovery from the fallout of overregulation, foreign competition and the rise of rival energy sources, including gas and renewables.

Raising the spectre of a nuclear race, Saudi foreign minister Adel Al-Jubeir last week reiterated the kingdom's warning that it would develop a nuclear weapon if Iran were to pursue military aspects of its programme.

Al-Jubeir as well as Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman have not defined what they would consider Iranian efforts to develop a nuclear weapon if Iran too decides to walk away from the 2015 agreement and revitalise its nuclear effort unfettered by the deal's restrictions.

Saudi distrust of Iranian intentions has been reinforced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's recent disclosure that the Jewish state's intelligence service had laid hands on 100,000 Iranian files that document Iranian efforts to develop a nuclear weapon prior to the 2015 agreement.

Iran has consistently denied that it wanted to develop a nuclear weapon. The Islamic republic has also said it would remain committed to the nuclear agreement despite the US withdrawal and re-imposition of sanctions if the other signatories—Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China—fulfilled their obligations and ensured that Iran would benefit economically.

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif is visiting Beijing, Moscow and Brussels to ascertain whether the signatories are committed to defying Trump by doing business with and investing in Iran despite the risk of their companies suffering the wrath of the US Treasury. 

US Energy Secretary Rick Perry is meanwhile hoping that Saudi Arabia's ambitious civil nuclear programme will create opportunities for American companies. The programme entails building 16 reactors by 2032 with a capacity of 17.6 gigawatts (GW).

Al-Jubeir said in March that the kingdom was engaged in talks with 10 nations about its nuclear programme, including Russia and China, countries that likely would be more amenable than the United States to reduced safeguards and broader arrangements.

Saudi Arabia has demanded in discussions with the Trump administration the right to enrich uranium and reprocess spent fuel into plutonium, potential building blocks for nuclear weapons, as part of any agreement with a US company. The Saudis argue that Iran has that right under the 2015 agreement.

Perry, in a first step to ensure that Westinghouse, the US company most immediately concerned, would have a fighting chance, persuaded Saudi Arabia to include American firms in a bid for its first two reactors. The kingdom had initially invited only Chinese, French, Russian and South Korean bidders.

The energy secretary is at the same time negotiating a non-proliferation trade or 123 Agreement with Saudi Arabia that is required by US law as a precondition for participation of American companies. A sticking point in the negotiations is the fact that the United Arab Emirates set a high benchmark when it accepted to forswear enrichment and reprocessing as part of its 123 Agreement.

The UAE this year completed construction of the Arab world's first commercial nuclear reactor. UAE ambassador Yousef al-Otaiba warned in 2015 after the conclusion of the Iran deal that it may want to amend its agreement to have the same right as Iran to enrich uranium.

“Your worst enemy has achieved this right to enrich. It's a right to enrich now that your friends are going to want, too, and we won't be the only country,” al-Otaiba was quoted as saying at the time.

The UAE has not publicly raised the issue since but could well do so if the Iran nuclear deal is definitively cancelled or Saudi Arabia is given the right to enrich.

Arguing in favour of boosting US nuclear exports to the Middle East, Katie Tubb, an analyst with the Washington-based Heritage Foundation that prides itself on two-thirds of its recommendations having been adopted by the Trump administration, noted that US support has helped “dissuade Saudi Arabia from extremism, boost its ability to defend itself against a rogue Iran, and enable it to fulfil its commitment to quell terrorism.”

Tubb went on to say that “contributing to Saudi Arabia's economic growth can be another powerful and persuasive answer to extremism by offering opportunity, greater freedom, education and jobs, social mobility, stability, and a dynamic, innovative future. Engaging with Saudi Arabia's new nuclear power industry through a 123 Agreement can play a big role in making that happen.”

Saudi demands for the right to enrich and a potential UAE backtracking on its arrangements that have been declared the gold standard for nuclear exports potentially leave Trump with a stark choice, Tubb's reasoning notwithstanding.

He either lowers the bar and risks fuelling a nuclear race in the Middle East or sticks to the high ground at the expense of opportunity for America's nuclear industry.

If Trump's record is anything to go by, his choice would seem a foregone conclusion.


Dr James M Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies, co-director of the University of Würzburg's Institute for Fan Culture, and co-host of the New Books in Middle Eastern Studies podcast. He is the author of The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer blog and a book with the same title, among several others.


Follow The Daily Star Opinion on Facebook for the latest opinions, commentaries and analyses by experts and professionals.

To contribute your article or letter to The Daily Star Opinion, see our guidelines for submission.


Stay updated on the go with The Daily Star News App. Click here to download it for your device.

Grameenphone and Robi:
Type START <space> BR and send SMS it to 2222

Banglalink:
Type START <space> BR and send SMS it to 2225

Leave your comments

Top News

Top News

Top