Comments on news report

“No change in GB structure,” published on August 8, 2013

Ash C.
That's not good enough, Mr. Muhit. You must respond officially to Prof. Yunus's rejoinder in response to the statement you made against him and Grameen Bank on the floor of the House during the last session. Your own self-respect should take precedence in this instance.

Khan from Ottawa, Canada
I do not understand why Mr. Yunus is still sticking his nose into Grameen Bank?

Fazlul Bari
You are absolutely right. He does not have any share in Grameen Bank, although he created it with borrowers' money.

Sheikh Monirul Islam, Opee
This one alone will cost Awami League 12 to 15% votes. Dr. Yunus has many foes, but Hasina and Muhit have made too many negative comments against this scholarly person making him more popular.

****

“The State versus Adilur: Facts against innuendoes” (August 13, 2013)

Nds
I humbly want to disagree with this author. The false and fabricated report that Mr. Rahman has made with a highly malevolent objective decisively disqualifies him to be identified as a human rights activist. Using the label of human rights activist he has distorted the meaning of human rights. But it is agreed that police should have followed the lawful procedures in arresting him.

Khan from Ottawa, Canada
Thanks to Mr. Abrar, President, Odhikar, for his comments. He wrote a nice article in support of Adilur, but unfortunately, he avoided the point which police raised -- the technique of photoshopping the picture published in the cover page. In a country where an ex-home minister was beaten by the police, what happened to Adilur is, perhaps, only normal.