The Daily Star

Your Right To Know
Monday, September 6, 2010

Sample Header adiv

Latest News _
Monday, January 4, 2010
Front Page

5th Amendment

SC lifts stay on verdict

Hears 2 petitions Jan 18

The Supreme Court (SC) yesterday lifted its four-year old stay order on a High Court (HC) verdict that had declared illegal and unconstitutional the fifth amendment to the country's constitution.

The amendment had legitimised all governments that had been in power following the coup of August 15, 1975 till April 9, 1979 including late president Ziaur Rahman's ascension to the presidency.

The SC Appellate Division yesterday also allowed withdrawal by the incumbent government and Muktijoddha Kalyan Trust of two leave to appeal petitions against the HC verdict.

The two petitions were filed by immediate past BNP-Jamaat-led alliance government and Muktijoddha Kalyan Trust in September 2005. Those two are among four such leave to appeal petitions aiming to protect the fifth amendment.

Dealing with the two remaining petitions, the apex court yesterday fixed January 18 for hearing arguments of the petitioners. BNP Secretary General Khandaker Delwar Hossain filed one of those petitions while three SC lawyers Tajul Islam, Kamruzzaman Bhuiyan, and Munshi Ahsan Kabir jointly filed the other, both of which were filed in May last year.

A five-member bench of the Appellate Division headed by Chief Justice Md Tafazzul Islam came up with the orders after hearing arguments of the incumbent attorney general, and counsels of the writ petitioner and appellants.

On August 29, 2005 the HC in a landmark verdict declared illegal and void the fifth amendment to the constitution, rendering illegal the regimes of Khandaker Moshtaque Ahmed, Abu Sadaat Mohammad Sayem, and Maj Gen Ziaur Rahman between August 15, 1975 and April 9, 1979.

The same day at midnight the Attorney General's Office, under the erstwhile BNP-Jamaat-led regime, urgently moved a petition to impose a stay on the HC verdict. The SC also issued the stay order the same night.

At that time, the erstwhile law minister Moudud Ahmed termed the HC verdict as 'valueless' saying it just created a 'temporary sensation', while leading lawyers hailed the verdict saying it proved that martial laws cannot change the constitution.

Incumbent Attorney General Mahbubey Alam told reporters yesterday that the HC judgement will remain upheld unless the apex court takes a decision contrary to the current one during adjudication of the remaining two leave to appeal petitions.

He said he will communicate the SC order to the government, so it may proceed to implement the HC verdict.

The attorney general said the fifth amendment is no more effective since yesterday's SC decision.

Replying to a question he said the government now has to reprint the constitution omitting the part of the fifth amendment.

He said the words Bismillahir Rahmanir Rahim however will not be removed from the preamble of the constitution.

Counsel for Khandaker Delwar Hossain, TH Khan however said the stay order on the effectiveness of the HC verdict will continue since two other leave to appeal petitions against the verdict are pending.

Constitution expert Dr M Zahir told The Daily Star that the HC verdict has been upheld by the SC order, but it is still under challenge until the remaining leave to appeal petitions are adjudicated.

Chairman of the Law Commission Justice MA Rashid said "If the High Court's judgement of declaring unconstitutional and illegal the fifth amendment to the constitution is upheld, the constitution should be read and enforced according to the directions given in the judgement until the constitution is amended in light of it."

The HC in its verdict noted that although all government activities during the said period are being declared illegal, the history cannot be altered. Many of those illegal acts were carried out in public interest. From that perspective, the court 'condones' some of the actions which could also have been carried out in line with the constitution.

The court said assumption of power by Khandaker Moshtaque Ahmed with effect from the morning of August 15, 1975 by placing Bangladesh under a martial law, and his assumption of the office of president of the People's Republic of Bangladesh by the Proclamation of August 20, 1975 were in clear violation of the constitution, and without lawful authority.

"Consequently, all his subsequent actions as the president of Bangladesh were illegitimate and void," it observed.

Taking over of the office of the president on November 6, 1975 by Justice Abu Sadaat Mohammad Sayem, his assumption of the powers of chief martial law administrator (CMLA), his act of appointing Ziaur Rahman as the deputy CMLA, and the Proclamation of November 8, 1975 were all in violation of the constitution, which means all his functions and actions as the president or CMLA were illegitimate, the verdict observed.

The HC verdict also directed the authorities to handover the property of the erstwhile Moon Cinema Hall in Waizghat in Dhaka to its original owner, who actually initiated the case through filing of a writ petition.

Masudul Alam, on behalf of Bangladesh Italian Marble Works Company (BIMWC), filed the writ petition in 1994 to reclaim ownership of Moon Cinema Hall which the government right after the country's independence announced as abandoned property and awarded to Muktijoddha Kalyan Trust.

The petition also challenged the legality of the Martial Law Regulation of 1977.

Share on



Rate the story

readers rating 5 / 5


Leave Comment

Comment Policy

Bangladesh Supreme/High Court has done their job perfectly and honestly. Among many other things, two of the fundamental principles of the nation-secularism and one party system were amended by 5th amendment when Bismillahir Rahmanir Rahim and restoration of multi party democracy were introduced. Now the question is, Can we go back to 4th amendment and keep the current government afloat? All political parties are the direct product of the 5th amendment. SC should also make its judgment on the Government of General Ershad and CTG of Fakhruddin.

: Jumana Sarwar

I think this a good slap on people, who think they can take the laws in their own hands, do whatever they please and then go for a nuclear option to add amendments to the sacred constitution and hope that the shameful chapters of our country would be forgotten and forgiven. I salute SC for doing the right thing for Bangladesh and putting people on spot for their past mistakes and crimes.

: DR
more comments (3)

Comments

  • Dev Saha
    Monday, January 4, 2010 09:15 AM GMT+06:00 (35 weeks ago)

    The HC (2005) verdict is one of the best value that we have seen so far. We should all be proud it because our justice system has finally showed the maturity and temperament that we need for our country.

    Mr. Ahmed was totally wrong about the verdict because he knew the value was paramount. Sad to see a law minister defending the indefensible!

Today's Paper

E-star

the electronic copy of the print edition with the power of web!


Click to read today's issue

advertisement

 


 Building a profile lets you access all the services profile
 RSS Feed updates you with the latest news Rss
 Listen to latest news and interviews Podcast
 Subscribe and get latest updates in your inbox News Mail
 Share videos and images you have witnessed and captured Witness
 Give us your story ideas Story Idea

News:

Views:

Sections:

Magazines

Others:

Star Archive


The Daily Star

© thedailystar.net, 1991-2008. All Rights Reserved