Maintain neutrality
Kamal Mostafa, Ottawa, Canada
When this caretaker administration under the leadership of Dr. Fakhruddin took power in Bangladesh, people heaved a sigh of relief as it ended the misrule and corruption of the BNP-Jamaat government. The anti-corruption drive of the government was appreciated much and it was expected that the administration would act neutrally. The government declared that it would take action against the big fish who were involved in massive corruption, not the small ones. In parliamentary democracy, the prime minister is responsible for all the actions of the government. So, why is the immediate past prime minister not being held responsible for what happened during the Jamaat-BNP rule?
|
|
